Marina Shores is the wrong project for Redwood City
published in the San Mateo Daily Journal, Oct. 5, 2004

by Cathy Moyer

Marina Shores is a project that represents a dramatic shift in the look and character of Redwood City and the entire Peninsula.  It would set a precedent for future development all along the Bay. In the recent past, such dramatic changes in "look and feel" have been attempted only after extensive public participation and outreach.  By contrast, the Marina Shores project provided extremely limited opportunities for public comment, with limited public awareness.

Those other major projects, the development of the Downtown Plan, the downtown Cinema project, and the Courthouse Square project each had multiple public meetings with hundreds of participants over an extended period of time.  Postcards, flyers, notifications in City billings -- many methods were used to notify residents of the studies underway, and the public hearings themselves were covered on public TV to expand the audience and citizen participation.  By contrast, this project has been largely hidden from public view.   The Marina Shores project, despite its enormity, had few meaningful attempts at outreach.  None of the public hearings prior to formal City Council action were carried on public television.

Having spent years developing the City's General Plan, Housing Element and Downtown Plan, Redwood City residents had, at a minimum, a reasonable expectation that new development proposals would be carefully screened for consistency with these strategic plans.  Instead, the City has dragged its feet on issuing formal approval on the Downtown Plan, approved an enormous development that directly contradicts every key feature of both that Plan and the City's overall General Plan, and did so without any real public outreach.  Proponents then have the gall to label citizens objecting to the circumvention of City goals as Johnny-come-lately's to the process.

The only public hearing held on this project before this year was in July of 2003.  The citizens who later banded together to invite greater public scrutiny by forcing this measure onto the ballot were at that meeting and at each of the public meetings in 2004.  The four-year process the City describes has been a private process, not a public one.  The City's anemic attempts to inform residents of the nature of this development failed so completely as to seem purposeful.

Marina Shores is about height, density, snarled traffic, scarce water supplies, and numerous environmental impacts.  The developer-sponsored literature depicting only street level views and coloring streets and sidewalks green would have you believe that it is about public access to the Bayfront.  Instead, Marina Shores would mean 17 skyscrapers.  It would mean the expansion of Woodside Rd, gridlock at Veterans and Broadway intersections with Woodside, and gridlock on Hwy 101.  It would mean taxing our already overextended water supply. The magnitude and scale of this project on a tiny site are profound.  The limitation on access because of its isolation makes the associated problems even more dramatic.

The 27 unmitigatable significant impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report are considered to be of such importance that the City Council had to pass a statement of "Overriding Consideration" before it could act on the project proposal.  Overriding all concerns about the impacts on traffic.  Overriding concerns about water supply. Overriding concerns about the impact on Bair Island.  Overriding strategic goals and guidelines developed over many years with genuine citizen participation.

Consideration for a developer, but not for residents.

Our citizens group, being outspent 10-1 in this campaign, is working hard with limited resources to provide voters with the information needed to make an informed decision. Please DO think it through.  You'll find this is the wrong project, in the wrong place, being promoted for the wrong reasons.

 

 

Home | Issues | You Can Help | Resources | News | About Us
site operated by Committee Against Measure Q/People For Housing Not High-Rises • web development by BGA Media