Dear Editor,
My objections
(to the Marina Shores project) are based on these points:
The previous
zoning allowed for low-rise buildings. The developer, who plans
to build 17 towers of 200 feet didn't want to follow the zoning
laws that apply to you and me. He went to the Planning Commission
and the City Council to get major zoning changes that an individual
business owner or homeowner could never get.
I object to
the fact that he plans to fill in 10 acres of the Bay.
How the Marina
Shores project looks has nothing to do with the amount of water
the project will use. Redwood City already uses 10 percent more
than it is allotted. At a cost of $40 million, Redwood City is
putting in a recycled water system. Now there will be enough water
so the City council approved the Marina Shores project. Is the
developer paying most of the $40 million? No. The people who use
Redwood City water are. And council is raising our rates.
How the project
looks has nothing to do with the increase in traffic, the cost
of widening Highway 101 at Whipple Avenue and the cost of putting
in another access road. Is the developer paying for this? No.
We the taxpayers are paying for most of it.
A developer
should be able to develop his own property if he follows the same
rules as the rest of us and if he pays for the entire project
himself.
M. Parkhurst
Redwood City